SURINDER SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PRESENT writ petition has been instituted, purportedly in public interest with a prayer that the respondent Mining Officer, Department of Industries, Pathankot, District Gurdaspur should initiate action against all those persons, including respondent No. 4, who are indulging in mining activity in the prohibited areas of villages Chhatwal, Barsoon, Mamoon and Sailikulian, Tehsil Pathankot, District Gurdaspur.

(2.) IN the writ petition, it has been averred that the petitioners are resident of village Mamoon and have relied upon Jamabandi (Annexure P-1) to state that they are co-sharers in the land, which fall in the revenue estate of Chakki Khud. It is further stated that this land is rich with minor minerals having huge reserves. The grievance of the petitioners is that certain owners of Stone Crushers are extracting the minerals from the land situated in village Mamoon, Chhatwal, Barsoon and Sailikulian falling in Tehsil Pathankot, District Gurdaspur. To fortify this submission, reliance has been placed on Notification issued by the Government of Punjab on 4th September, 1989, whereby a complete ban has been imposed for carrying mining activity in the area falling within the jurisdiction of the above said villages. Copy of the Notification dated 4th September, 1989 has been annexed as Annexure P-2. The petitioners have pleaded that owners of Stone Crushers in the States of Himachal Pradesh and Punjab situated near the vicinity of these villages, in connivance with the officials of the Mining Department, are extracting the minerals, even though Notification (Annexure P-2) prescribes complete prohibition to any kind of mining activity. To support this contention, counsel for the petitioners has relied upon various photographs, which have been annexed as Annexure P-3. It is further the case of the petitioners that they had made representation (Annexure P-4) but the respondent authorities had taken no action.

(3.) THE State Government has taken a stand that to check the illegal mining, a District Level Task Force Committee has been constituted under the Chairmanship of the Deputy Commissioner with the Senior Superintendent of Police and the Mining Officer as Executive Members. The said Committee reviews the matters regarding illegal mining in the area on quarterly basis and the last meeting was held on 9th April, 2009. The surveillance of the area has been stepped up and in April 2009, six FIRs were registered against the persons, who were indulging in mining activity. Specific complaint of the petitioners made against Laxmi Stone Crusher, respondent No. 5, was also enquired into. A team consisting of the Senior Industrial Promotion Officer and the Mining Guard was deputed on 16th April, 2009, which found that Sukhdev Sharma, an employee of respondent No. 5 Laxmi Stone Crusher, was extracting minor minerals illegally. A report was sent to the Station House Officer, Mamoon Cantt. Tehsil Pathankot, on the basis of which, FIR has been registered. Surprise raid was also conducted on 5th April, 2009, thereafter a show-cause notice was also issued to respondent No. 5 Laxmi Stone Crusher, to explain the source of the stock of stoned material. A reply to the show-cause notice was received, wherein the respondent No. 5 Laxmi Stone Crusher has made an attempt to justify that the stoned material was brought from Bhadroya quarry and the documents in support thereof were also submitted. However, further action has been initiated under Rule 54-C (5) of Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1964. The office of Mining Officer, Pathankot statedly is keeping a watchful eye on the activities of respondent No. 5 Laxmi Stone Crusher, Mamoon.