(1.) The order of the learned Judge cannot be sustained. It has been held in Shankar Singh and others v. The Union of India, 1988 1 RentLR 286that a land-owner whose land has been acquired under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immoveable Property Act, 1952, is entitled to the benefits of the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 .
(2.) The Court is under an obligation to allow the benefits of the amended Act to the land-owners. It has been settled that even if the acquisition has been made under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immoveable Property Act, 1952, even then the land-owner is entitled to the benefits of the amended Act.
(3.) This revision petition is accordingly hereby accepted and I direct the learned Judge to redetermine the compensation in the light of the observations made above.