VIKRAM CHIB Vs. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for parties and perused the record.

(2.) THIS judgment shall also dispose of connected C.W.P. No. 15836 of 2007. These writ petitions impugn a common question of law and for the purpose of their disposal only the facts of C.W.P. No. 12013 of 2007 are being mentioned.

(3.) IN the light of said order, we examined the register. During the course of further hearing, it also came to our notice that there is a specific provision as per Section 42 of Haryana Urban Development Act, 1977 (for short 'the Act') for service of notice and letters etc. This section on reproduction reads as under :