COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. SUPREME BUILDERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE Revenue has filed the present appeal under Section 260A of the IT Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh, Bench 'A' Chandigarh (for short Tribunal'), dt. 25th Jan., 2007, passed in ITA No. 261/Chd/2005 for the asst. yr. 2001 -02 raising the following proposed substantial question of law:

(2.) THE respondent is a firm and a civil contractor. Return for the asst. yr. 2001 -02 was filed on 9th March, 2002, declaring an income of Rs. 12,990. In the return, income was worked out by adopting 10 per cent of the gross receipts of Rs. 78,57,707 as income and further reducing interest paid to partners, salary to partners and depreciation, thereby arriving at the net taxable income of Rs. 12,990. During the course of assessment proceedings, revised computation of income was filed by increasing the figure of gross receipts from contract from Rs. 78,57,707 to Rs. 93,65,886. In the revised computation, the quantum of admissible salary to partners was also increased from Rs. 75,722 to Rs. 1,48,309. The assessment was framed under Section 143(3) at an income of Rs. 22,15,480 by rejecting books of accounts, adopting 12 per cent of the gross receipts of Rs. 78,57,707 as income, making an addition of Rs. 15,08,181 on account of receipts not declared in the original computation (Rs. 93,65,886 - 78,57,707) and further allowing depreciation, but not allowing deduction on account of interest and salary to partners holding that the assessee has failed to prove the factum of payment and as cash system of accounting is being followed, the expenses on account of interest and salary are disallowed.

(3.) AGGRIEVED against the said order, the Revenue filed the appeal before the Tribunal, Chandigarh, questioning the deduction on account of salary and interest allowed to the partners of the assessee. The Revenue also contested the directions of the CIT(A) to assess only 12 per cent of profit in respect of difference as per revised return receipts. The Tribunal vide impugned order dt. 25th Jan., 2007, dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue.