PUNITA CHAUDHARY Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer for quashing notification dated 28.11.2007 (P-5) issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity, 'the Act') and declaration of the same date made under Section 6 read with Section 17(2)(c) and 17(4) of the Act (P-6). The public purpose for acquisition of land as per the notifications is construction of approach road from National Highway-65 to Haryana Thermal Power Plant, Hisar [now named as Rs.2 x 600 MW Rajiv Gandhi Thermal Power Plant' (for brevity, 'Thermal Power Plant')].

(2.) BRIEF facts of the case are that the land comprised in Rect. No. 282//14Min, 15Min and Rect. No. 283//20Min, situated in village Khedar, Sub Tehsil Barwala, District Hisar, is the subject matter of dispute in the present case. Petitioner No. 1-Smt. Punita Chaudhary owned land comprised in Rec. No. 282//14Min, 15Min, situated in village Khedar, Sub Tehsil Barwala, District Hisar, which she leased out for 99 years in favour of Alliance Education Societypetitioner No. 2, vide registered sale deed dated 10.9.2007. On the land comprised in Rect. No. 283/20Min a factory, namely, Amba Polymer exists, which was purchased by petitioner No. 3-Sanjay Makhija from the Haryana Financial Corporation, vide conveyance deed dated 9.3.2004.

(3.) THE petitioners have asserted that two separate notifications under Sections 4 and 6 read with Section 17(2)(c) and 17(4) of the Act, proposing to acquire land in question, have been issued on 28.11.2007. They have alleged that if the proposed acquisition is permitted then it would divide the college building rendering it unfit for the purpose of education as also the factory owned by petitioner No. 3. They have disputed invocation of urgency provision and have also pointed out that already a kacha rasta on the Government land leading from NH-65 Hisar-Barwala Road to the Thermal Power Plant is available, which is Marked 'C' on the site plan (P-4), which could easily be used by the respondents without damaging the factory premises and dividing the college building of petitioner No. 2 Society.