LAWS(P&H)-2008-4-136

MAHESH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Decided On April 22, 2008
MAHESH Appellant
V/S
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 18.12.1998, rendered by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Hisar, vide which it convicted the accused/appellant Mukesh and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years, and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/ -, and in default of payment of the same, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for another period of two years for the offence punishable under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter called as 'the Act' only) for having been found in possession of 20 kilograms of poppy husk, without any permit or licence.

(2.) THE facts, in brief, are that on 26 -03 -1995, Inspector Murari Lal, (PW -9) while being posted as SHO of Police Station, Fatehabad received a wireless message, from police control room Hisar, for holding a picket on Bhuna Fatehabad Road. In pursuance of this message, he along with Head Constable, Dharampal, PW -8, Constable Rakesh Kumar, PW -5 and other police officials held the picket, on Bhuna Hisar Road. At about 4.15 p.m., Mukesh - accused, was seen coming on a scooter, without having number plate, from the side of Bhuna, carrying a bag tied on the pillion. He was apprehended. On search of the bag, in accordance with the provisions of law, 20 kilograms of poppy husk, was recovered. A sample was taken out, and the remaining poppy husk, was put into the same bag. The sample and the bag were converted into parcels, sealed, and thereafter taken into possession vide memo Ex.PE, attested by the witnesses. Ruqa Ex.PG was sent to the Police Station, on the basis whereof, FIR Ex.PH, was recorded. Site plan exhibit PJ of the place of recovery was prepared, with correct marginal notes. The accused was arrested. The statements of the witnesses were recorded. After the completion of investigation, the accused was challaned.

(3.) THE prosecution, in support of its case, examined Nasib Singh, PW -1, Jaswant Kaur, PW -2, Ram Chander, ASI, PW -3, Mange Ram, D.S.P., PW -4, Rakesh Kumar, Constable, PW -5, Mam Chand, Inspector, PW -6, Mukesh Chand, Constable, PW -7, Dharampal, Head Constable, PW -8 and Murari Lal, Inspector, PW -9. Thereafter, the Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, closed the prosecution evidence.