TEK RAM Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) WE have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the pleas raised in the petition. His challenge is to the following orders :-

(2.) THE main order under challenge in this case is the one passed by Prescribed Authority, Narwana on 27.6.1978 by which certain area of the petitioner was declared surplus. The first time the petitioner agitated against this order was by way of an application under section 18 of the Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act for correction of clerical mistake in calculating the total holding of the applicant on 17.4.03. However, what was actually sought was to give effect to a Civil court decree in favour of Smt. Narma mother of the petitioner. The Prescribed Authority dismissed the application holding that there was no clerical error in the order dated 27.6.1978. Appeal filed before Collector, Kaithal as also the revision before the Commissioner also failed leading to the present petition.