NARINDER KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS judgment shall dispose of two Criminal Appeals, bearing No. 587-DB of 2004 and No. 1329-SB of 2004 as also Criminal Revision No. 1902 of 2004, as all these have arisen out of the same judgment dated 2.6.2004 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Ambala.

(2.) MANY laws have been made to protect the matrimonial ties and also to save the woman from the atrocities committed by her husband or his relatives, but at the same time, administration of justice was not in the interest of making misuse of the trust, created by law in her and her relatives, but we are not in dearth of such cases, where exaggeration of facts is made, net is thrown wider and law is used as an instrument to create a hole in the administration of justice. In such situation, the courts are not helpless or silent spectators to sift the chaff from the grain and not hesitant in condemning such acts on the part of the complainant.

(3.) ON commitment, accused Lajwanti was charged under Section 498-A/406 IPC. Accused Narinder Kumar was charged under Sections 498-A/406/376(2)(g)/506 IPC, while accused Aman Kumar was charged under Sections 376(2)(g)/506 IPC. All the accused denied the charges and opted for trial.