GURMIT KAUR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for quashing the impugned letter dated 27.5.2008 (Annexure P-6) vide which the respondent authorities have clarified that in case the post of Sarpanch is reserved for the woman belonging to a Scheduled Caste category, then even a woman belonging to Scheduled Caste but elected from General Category, can contest for the office of Sarpanch reserved for Scheduled Caste (Woman) provided she produces a Scheduled Caste certificate to the Presiding Officer. It has also been prayed that as a consequence thereof, all the proceedings made in compliance with the impugned letter be declared as null and void. It has been further prayed that a direction be issued to the respondents to fill up the post of Sarpanch from amongst Panches elected against seats reserved for Scheduled Caste (Woman) only and declare the petitioner as Sarpanch of Village Gram Panchayat Maulie, being the only candidate elected as Panch from the said category.

(2.) It is the case of the petitioner that the post of Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat of the village was reserved for Scheduled Caste (Woman) and the petitioner is the only Scheduled Caste Panch, who can be elected against the aforesaid reserved seat of Sarpanch as she has been elected from the reserved category of Scheduled Caste (Woman). Respondent No.6, though a woman belonging to Scheduled Caste, was not eligible to contest the election of Sarpanch of the village as she was elected as Panch from General Category. However, she has been illegally elected as Sarpanch of Village Gram Panchayat Maulie. Undisputedly, the petitioner had also contested the election of Sarpanch, but respondent No.6 secured more votes, therefore, she was declared elected as Sarpanch.

(3.) Now the question arises for consideration is whether respondent No.6, who is a woman belonging to Scheduled Caste, can contest the election for the post of Sarpanch, which is reserved for Scheduled Caste (Woman), irrespective of the fact that she was elected as Panch of the Gram Panchayat against the reserved seat of General Category. The similar question has been answered by the Supreme Court in Kasambhai F. Ghanchi v. Chandubhai D.Rajput and others, 1998 119 PunLR 611, wherein it was held that a candidate belonging to a Backward Class, who has been elected from an unreserved seat, is eligible to contest the election for the post of President of the Municipality which was reserved for a Backward Class candidate, while making the following observations:-