MALKIAT SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE three writ petitioners who are sons of Ram Asra, are aggrieved at the order dated 03.03.2006 (Annexure P-18) passed by respondents Nos. 2 and 3 to the extent they have been denied allotment of one plot of 500 square yards or two plots of 250 square yards each under the Oustees Quota. The petitioners accordingly seek a direction to respondents Nos. 2 and 3 for allotment of a one kanal plot or two plots of 250 square yards or even if those are not available, two plots of 8 marla each, in accordance with the policy decision taken by respondent No. 2 Haryana Urban Development Authority (in short 'HUDA').

(2.) THE undisputed facts are that the petitioners were joint owners of land measuring 40 kanals and 18 marlas situated in the revenue estate of village Railly, District Panchkula. Their land was acquired by the State Government for urbanisation/expansion of Urban Estate, Panchkula by the HUDA.

(3.) SOME of the salient features of the policy guideline dated 10.09.1987 as modified subsequently on 18.03.1992 are as follows :