SANTOSH KUMARI Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for parties and perused the writ records.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for petitioner submitted that State did not consider her claim for a plot under the 'oustees quota' proportionate to the land acquired nor her application was processed in general category.

(3.) THIS is also a submission of learned counsel for HUDA that petitioner purchased the land in question after Section 4 Notification issued on 16.3.1999, thus, her case could not have been considered for allotment of a plot under 'oustees quota'.