REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Gram Panchayat, Badrukhan Appellant

V/S

Addl. Director Of Consolidation Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

GRAM PANCHAYAT SAHARA (FORMERLY DHUMMA) ETC. V. BALDEV SINGH [REFERRED TO]
KALA SINGH V. COMMISSIONER,HISAR DIVISION [REFERRED TO]
GRAM PANCHAYAT GUNIA MAJRI V. DIRECTOR,CONSOLIDATION OF HOLDINGS [REFERRED TO]
BAJ SINGH V. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
BHAGAT RAM VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
GRAM PANCHAYAT NURPUR VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
JOGINDER SINGH VS. DIRECTOR CONSOLIDATION OF HOLDINGS PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
GRAM PANCHAYAT VS. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR CONSOLIDATION [REFERRED TO]
BHAGWAN SINGH VS. DIRECTOR CONSOLIDATION OF HOLDINGS [REFERRED TO]
GURJANT SINGH VS. COMMISSIONER FEROZEPORE DIVISION [REFERRED TO]
CHANAN KAUR VS. KARTARI D [REFERRED TO]
SEM PAL VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
GURDIAL SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
GRAM PANCHAYAT, BHATTIAN BET VS. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION, PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
GRAM PANCHAYAT, VILLAGE SHEKHUPUR VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
GRAM PANCHAYAT, VILLAGE KHERI MANIAN VS. DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION OF HOLDINGS, PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
CHAJJU RAM VS. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, PANCHAYATS (COMMISSIONER), PUNJAB AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
DES RAJ AND ANR. VS. THE GRAM SABHA OF VILLAGE LADHOT AND ANR. [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner-Gram Panchayat has filed the present writ petition for quashing of order dated November 18, 1981 (Annexure P-1) and order dated April 24, 1984 (Annexure P-2) passed by Additional Director Consolidation of Holdings, Punjab (respondent No. 1).

(2.) RESPONDENT No. 3 Bant Singh and Respondent No. 4 Waryam Singh filed an application under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 (hereinafter called 'the Act of 1948') before respondent No. 1, which was allowed vide order dated November 18, 1981. The relevant portion of the order is reproduced as under :

(3.) THE sole argument of Mr. S.S. Salar, learned counsel for the petitioner- Gram Panchayat, is that the Director had no jurisdiction to go into the question whether the land in dispute was Shamlat Deh, Gram Panchayat or proprietors of the village and had wrongly decided by passing orders Annexures P-1 and P-2. In support of his contention, Mr. Salar has relied upon a judgment of the Supreme Court reported as Gram Panchayat, Nurpur v. State of Punjab and others, 1997(3) RCR(Civil) 47 : (1998)8 Supreme Court Cases 672 and argued that the case of the petitioner Gram Panchayat is fully covered by this judgment. The relevant portion of the judgment is reproduced as under :

Click here to view full judgment.

GRAM PANCHAYAT, BADRUKHAN Vs. ADDL. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address