RAKESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS appeal is directed against the order dated 15.04.2008, rendered by the Special Judge, Ambala, vide which, he imposed penalty of Rs. 50,000/- on Rakesh Kumar,applicant (hereinafter referred to as 'appellant'), who stood surety for Rakesh Kumar son of Anand Bansal, accused, and failed to produce him in the Court.

(2.) RAKESH Kumar son of Mela Ram, stood surety, for Rakesh Kumar son of Anand Bansal, accused in case FIR No. 153 dated 20.06.2003, under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Police Station GRPS, Ambala Cantt, in the sum of Rs. 50,000/-, undertaking to produce him, on each and every date of hearing, failing which to pay the amount of forfeited surety bond to the State of Haryana. Rakesh Kumar son of Anand Bansal, accused absented from the Court on 16.10.2007. His bail order was cancelled, his bail bonds were forfeited and he was ordered to be summoned through non-bailable warrants. Till date, he has neither been arrested, nor the appellant has produced him in the Court.

(3.) FEELING aggrieved, the instant appeal, was filed by Rakesh Kumar, appellant.