(1.) CHALLENGE in this revision is, to an order dated 20.3.2006 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Barnala and order dated 15.6.2006 passed by the Additional District Judge, Barnala.
(2.) COUNSEL for the petitioner contends that the petitioner's brother Mohinder Kapil is the judgement-debtor. The petitioner's property,namely his machinery was attached in Execution Application No. 23 of 15.5.2001. The petitioner, therefore, filed objections, to the attachment, raising specific pleas :-
(3.) COUNSEL for the respondent, on the other hand, states that the respondent is in possession of documents, which would show that Mohinder Kapil is a partner in M/s Kannu Printing Press and, therefore, owner to the extent of 1/2 share of the property, owned by M/s Kannu Printing Press. It is, thus, asserted that the learned Executing Court, rightly dismissed the objections, as they were without merit. As regards the petitioner's submission, with respect to loan and bills of purchase, it is submitted that documents were never placed before the trial Court and no opportunity to lead evidence was ever sought.