VIJAY PARKASH BHARDWAJ Vs. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner, who was working as Superintendent (Grade-I) in the office of the Legal Remembrancer, Haryana Urban Development Authority, (for short 'H.U.D.A'), Panchkula, was compulsorily retired from service vide order dated January 30, 2008 (Annexure P-9), which is reproduced as below :-

(2.) It is the case of the petitioner that he was never conveyed any adverse confidential report in his whole service career except the report for the period from June 14, 1989 to October 20, 1989. In the said report, the integrity of the petitioner was shown doubtful. The petitioner filed civil suit for expunging the said adverse remarks and the Civil Court vide judgment dated May 20, 2000, expunged the said adverse remarks. The department went in appeal against the judgment dated May 20, 2000, which was dismissed. Thus, the judgment of the Civil Court attained finality.

(3.) It is further case of the petitioner that he was also issued another charge-sheet dated November 24, 2003 on the following allegations :-