SAMEER JUNEJA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) C .M. No. 4353 of 2008 : Application is allowed. Rejoinder filed to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondents No. 2 to 4 is taken on record. CWP No. 2066 of 2008 :

(2.) THIS petition has been filed aggrieved the order dated 14.12.2007 (P.25) of the Revisional Authority setting aside the order dated 8.12.2006 (P.20) passed by the Appellate Authority.

(3.) WHEN no response was received from the respondent, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the respondent, No. 3 under the HUDA Act against cancellation order dated 17.4.2006 (P.16). Said appeal was accepted by respondent No. 3 vide order dated 8.12.2006. The appellate authority set aside the cancellation order of respondent No. 4 subject to payment of dues, surcharge and and interest as per the HUDA rules. The appellate authority further ordered that Estate Officer, HUDA would intimate the due amount to be deposited within 15 days from the date of the order and the petitioner was directed to deposit the demanded amount within 30 days from the date of demand made by the Estate Officer, failing which the cancellation order would stand revived. In the menawhile, it seems that no amount, as directed by the appellate authority, was communicated to the petitioner and the petitioner, on 21.12.2006, again requested respondent No. 4 to intimate him the upto date amount due so that he could deposit the same within stipulated period of 30 days of the order of the appellate authority. As no reply was received from the respondent, the petitioner of his own again deposited further sum of Rs. 5,77,500/- thereby making total payment of Rs. 27,87,500/-. In the meanwhile, respondent No. 4 filed a revision against the order passed by respondent No. 3. Revisional Authority set aside the order passed by the Appellate Authority. Aggrieved by the said impugned order passed by the Revisional Authority, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.