SUNIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY way of present appeal the appellant has challenged his conviction and sentence awarded under Sections 366-A and 376 of the Indian Penal Code.

(2.) FIR No. 121 dated 2.7.2004 was registered under Sections 363, 366 and 120-B IPC at Police Station Adampur, on the statement of Subhash Chander son of Ram Partap, resident of village Sishwal, District Hisar, on the allegations that he has two daughters and two sons.

(3.) IT was also the case of the prosecution that Sunil appellant used to come to meet Sanjay in the house of his brother and on personal enquiry the complainant was confident that his daughter Sumitra has been taken away by Sunil son of Naresh in connivance with his elder sister, Parmod and Vinod.