MANJU JOON Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the Code) has been moved for quashing of complaint and summoning order passed by the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridabad in the complaint filed under sections 138/142 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short the Act).

(2.) THE petitioner has been summoned to face trial for an offence under section 138 of the Act being partner of M/s Satyam Urja Udyog i.e. accused No. 1 in the complaint. The allegations against the petitioner in the complaint read as under :

(3.) MR . Sunil Chadha, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the present complaint has been filed by Naresh Goyal as Satbir Singh Joon accused No. 2 i.e. the husband of the petitioner has fallen apart from Hari Kishan Goyal accused No. 4 the brother of the complainant Naresh Goyal. It is also the case of the petitioner that the petitioner has been implicated in the present case being the wife of Satbir Singh Joon accused No. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that it has been wrongly mentioned in the complaint that cheque was issued by accused Nos. 2 and 3, husband of the petitioner and petitioner. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that she is not incharge and responsible for the conduct of business of the firm nor there are any allegations in this regard.