BASANT GOPAL SHARMA Vs. AMAR NATH GUPTA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner herein filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against respondent No. 1. Contention in brief is that on considering the preliminary evidence and the contents of the complaint, the respondent was summoned. Subsequently, an application was filed by the accused for review of the Court order. The application has been allowed vide Order dated 17.12.2003 by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Sonepat. The petitioner being aggrieved by the same filed a revision petition before the Additional Sessions Judge, Sonepat. The revision has also been dismissed.

(2.) THE controversy raised before the Revisional Court was that it cannot be said that no notice had been sent.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner has referred to the order of summoning passed by the Trial Court. In Para 3 of the order, the following has been recorded :-