LAWS(P&H)-2017-5-224

SANJAY TOMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Decided On May 03, 2017
Sanjay Tomar Appellant
V/S
State Of Haryana And Others Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) In this writ petition, petitioner has sought for the following relief:-

(2.) Brief facts of the case are as follows:-

(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently submitted that there were no backlog vacancies, no documents have been made available so as to contend that out of reserved posts some of posts are backlog. Thus, reserving 5 posts for other than general category would be in violation of Supreme Court's decision rendered in Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, reported in (1992) Suppl. 3 SCC 217. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied on para 385, which reads as under:-