SHANTI DEVI Vs. AMAR SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE appellants have filed the present appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent impugning judgment dated 4.1.2006 of the learned Single Judge passed in C.W.P. No. 10982 of 1999.

(2.) BEFORE we advert to the controversy raised in the appeal, we deem it appropriate to notice the facts.

(3.) THE appellants, who felt aggrieved against the order of the Commissioner, preferred a revision petition before the Financial Commissioner, who upset the orders of the lower revenue authorities and ordered the eviction of the private respondents by holding that since the amount of Batai worked out by AC 1st Grade, i.e., Rs. 96221.86 was known to them (the tenant-respondents), they ought to have made the payment of the same and their failure to do so necessarily should result in their ejectment.