UJAGAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) CHALLENGE in this writ petition is to orders dated 17.4.1997, 26.3.2001 and 25.3.2004 passed by the Collector, the Commissioner Patiala Division, Patiala and the Financial Commissioner (Appeals-II), Punjab, respectively rejecting the petitioner's claim to be appointed as a Lambardar.

(2.) THE demise of the incumbent Lambardar Sh. Uttam Singh led to a proclamation by the Collector for filling up of the vacancy. After following the process prescribed, namely; inviting applications, recommendations by the Tehsildar, the Naib Tehsildar, etc. and permitting prospective candidates to lead evidence the Collector, Roop Nagar, vide order dated 17.4.1997 held that respondent No. 5 was the most suitable candidate to be appointed to the post of Lambardar. The petitioner preferred an appeal before the Commissioner, which was dismissed vide order dated 26.3.2001. A revision filed before the Financial Commissioner, (Appeals-II) Punjab was also dismissed vide order dated 25.3.2004.

(3.) COUNSEL for the respondents, however, contends that the Collector, recorded his subjective satisfaction, as to the merits of the candidates after a considered appraisal thereof. The Collector's choice was upheld by the Commissioner and the Financial Commissioner. The contentions raised by counsel for the petitioner do not merit acceptance.