(1.) SINCE a common question of law and facts is involved in all these petitions, they are being disposed of by this judgment passed in C.W.P. No. 4997 of 1986.
(2.) THE facts of all the petitions are similar except the change in the names of petitioner firms.
(3.) UPON notice, respondent No. 2 filed separate written statements in all the petitions. Justifying the action of black-listing the petitioners from carrying out any further transactions on the grounds set out in the impugned orders, dismissal of the petitions has been sought.