(1.) DEFENDANT No. 1 is in revision aggrieved against the order of the learned trial Court dated 25.8.2004 whereby an application for correction of the judgment and decree was declined.
(2.) THE grievance of the petitioner is that in a suit for declaration, the shares of the parties in the land were incorrectly mentioned and such mistake was not noticed while filing the written statement and consequently the decree was passed. Therefore, the shares of each of the parties are required to be corrected.
(3.) THE shares of the parties, as mentioned above, are not disputed by learned Counsel for the plaintiffs -respondents before this Court, but it is argued that the application for correction of the judgment and decree has been filed after 9 years of passing of the decree which is not permissible.