(1.) THIS judgment will dispose of eight civil writ petitions Nos. 3737, 4034, 4379, 4384, 4727, 4458, 6560 and 6453 of 2007, as common question of law and facts are involved in these cases.
(2.) IN the aforesaid writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged the orders of Haryana Urban Development Authority charging compound interest on the delayed payments of additional prices of the plots.
(3.) AFTER hearing counsel for the parties, we are of the considered view that the matter involved in these writ petitions is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in Gian Inder Sharma case (supra). In the said case, it was held as under :-