KIRPAL SINGH Vs. VIPIN KUMAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) NOTICE of this revision was sent to the respondent. As reported by the Registry, respondent has been duly served. None appears. He is set ex parte.

(2.) I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

(3.) THE defendant denied the execution of the rent note and also the receipts (Exs. P -18 and 19). Though, the evidence has been led to prove these documents. The plaintiff also moved an application under Section 45/73 of the Indian Evidence Act, seeking a direction for personal appearance of the defendant in the Court for giving his thumb impressions and specimen signatures for comparison with the disputed documents by the Expert.