DAVINDER PRITPAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for quashing order dated 8.1.2007 (P-2) vide which pay of the petitioner for the period from 2001 to 2004 has been fixed. It has been asserted that the pay of the petitioner has been wrongly fixed, inasmuch as, his date of annual grade increment has been changed from 1.1.2000 to 23.1.2001 without assigning any reason.

(2.) WE have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner at some length and perused the paper book.

(3.) IT . is also well settled that before seeking a direction or a writ of mandamus, a demand justice notice or representation is required to be served on the respondents as has been done in the present case. The petitioner before approaching this Court had sent a representation, dated 17.1.2007 (P-3), to which no reply is stated to have been received. It has also been observed by the Hon'ble the Supreme Court that in cases where such like notice/representation has not been replied then cost is required to be imposed. Therefore, without going into the merits of the case, we dispose of the writ petition at this stage with a direction to the respondents to take a decision on the representation dated 17.1.2007 (P-3) by passing a speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.