LAWS(P&H)-2007-3-207

STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. BASANT SINGH

Decided On March 22, 2007
STATE OF PUNJAB Appellant
V/S
BASANT SINGH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Application is allowed. Documents annexed with it , are taken on record. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to quash the order dated 21.04.2005 (Annexure P-5), vide which, application filed by the petitioner-State, under Sections 4 and 5 of the Punjab Public Premises and (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1973 (in short 'the Act'), was dismissed. Further prayer is to quash the order dated 10.05.2006 (Annexure P-4), vide which, appeal filed by the petitioner was also dismissed.

(2.) It is apparent from the record that the petitioner, by claiming ownership over the land, in dispute, filed an application under Section 5 of the Act, for ejectment of respondent No.1 from the land, description of which was given in that application. By taking note of dismissal of earlier application, filed by the petitioner-State and also the fact that, as per the admission made by the petitioner-State, respondent No. 1 was a tenant over the land, in dispute, application for ejectment was dismissed. In appeal, the petitioner-State also failed. The appellate Court, while dismissing the appeal, has observed, thus:- "After perusing the record of the file and after going through the argument advanced by the land counsel of the parties. This Court comes to the conclusion that the Punjab State is owner of land measuring 37 Kanals 7 Marlas comprised in Rect. And Killa Nos. 45//16 (8-0) 24 (8-0), 25(8-0), 57//4/2 (2-0) 5(3-7) of Village Makhewala, Tehsil Sardulgarh District Mansa as per jamabandi 2002- 2003 and earlier P.W.D. Department was shown as cultivator in column No. 5. It is important to mention here that earlier an application under Section 4,5 and 7 of the Punjab Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1973 was filed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Canal Department, Jhunir on dated 03.06.1994 before Collector Sub Divisional, Sardulgarh, which was decided in their favour on 24.05.1995, but the respondent No. 1 filed an appeal before Commissioner, Faridkot Division, Faridkot against this order in which the order was passed in the following terms:-

(3.) On the basis of above said facts and circumstances, the appeal of the appellant is dismissed and the order passed by the lower court is restored. Further, the appellant is instructed to initiate any other legal process before the other competent legal authority. The record of the Lower Court of Collector sub Division, Sardulgarh along with the copy of this order is sent to him. The file be consigned in the record room."