HARNEK SINGH Vs. KANSI RAM

JUDGEMENT

(1.) C.M. No. 6970 -C of 2006.

(2.) THE defendant is in second appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below whereby suit of the plaintiff for recovery of Rs. 1,72,000/ - on the basis of Pronote and Receipt, was decreed.

(3.) THE defendant denied the execution of the Pronote and Receipt and alleged that the Pronote and Receipt are forged, fabricated and without consideration. It is alleged that the plaintiff is running a Karyana shop in the village and also runs the business of the Commission Agent. The defendant had been selling his crops through the Commission Agent shop of the plaintiff for a long time. The defendant stopped visiting the shop of the plaintiff as the plaintiff did not render the accounts of sale of crops to the defendant. Subsequently, the accounts were settled and it was found that plaintiff owes some amount to the defendant, but nothing was due against the defendant.