RAM RAJI Vs. FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, HARYANA AND ORS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Dispute in this writ petition pertains to the appointment of Lambardar in Village Bajana Kalan, Tehsil Ganaur, District Sonepat. On accrual of vacancy for the said post, applications were invited. Petitioner, respondent No.4 and one Bhagirath were the applicants. The Collector appointed respondent No.4 as Lambardar of the Village and while disposing of that case, it was observed as under: -

(2.) Petitioner failed in appeal and his revision was also dismissed. We feel that the order dated 11.04.2005, passed by the Collector is perfectly justified. As per established law, choice of the Collector, in the cases of appointment of Lambardar, is not to be interfered with, unless the same is perverse in law and facts. Nothing in that regard has been indicated to us, which may necessitate any interference. Otherwise on merits, we feel that respondent No.4 is a better candidate. No case is made out for interference.

(3.) Dismissed.