BAHADUR SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE petitioner Bahadur Singh seeks regular bail pending trial for the offences under Sections 302 etc. of the IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the complainant has vehemently opposed the application for bail and submitted that despite Kamlesh, who was granted the concession of bail vide order dated 21.8.2007, the learned Additional Sessions (Fast Track Court), Gurgaon has considered the matter and observed that Kamlesh was a lady and injury attributed to her was not reflected in the MLR or the post-mortem report. It was observed that injury attributed to the petitioner Bahadur Singh is reflected in the post-mortem report.