HARPREET SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482, Cr PC for quashing of the FIR dated 7.11.2001, registering against them under Sections 498 -A/406 and 34, IPC.

(2.) THIS FIR was registered at the instance of Respondent No. 2 Smt. Daljeet Kaur, who is wife of Petitioner No. 1. Copy of the compromise is annexed with the petition as Annexure P -2. The counsel appearing for Respondent No. 2 has disclosed in the reply that the compromise, on the basis of which the quashing is sought, has not materialised. It is stated to be a paper transaction only. It is further stated that the Petitioners have succeeded in getting the compromise signed by playing fraud upon Respondent No. 2 and she has withdrawn from the said compromise. It is further disclosed that she never made a statement before the Court where the proceedings under Section 13 -B of the Hindu Marriage Act were pending. The said petition statedly was also dismissed. Accordingly, it is pleaded that there is no compromise Hence the present FIR cannot be ordered to be quashed on the basis of compromise (Annexure P -2).