(1.) PETITIONER Dr. R. K. Sood has assailed the order of the learned District Judge, Chandigarh dated 3. 11. 1995 in this revision petition on various grounds.
(2.) BUT the main and in fact the only argument advanced on behalf of the petitioner is that an application for grant of interim maintenance to a minor child is not maintainable under the provisions of Hindu Marriage Act. Further more it is argued in any case an application for maintenance only on behalf of a minor child cannot be maintained by the mother in whose custody the child is under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'.
(3.) RECONCILIATION efforts by the Courts even failed at all stages.