DES RAJ KALRA Vs. RAJ RANI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS petition has been filed challenging the order of interim maintenance to the wife who is respondent in this case passed by the learned Sub Division Judicial Magistrate, Phagwara.

(2.) HEARD learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned Advocate for the respondent.

(3.) LEARNED Advocate for the petitioner has cited before me the case of Sardar Surjeet Singh v. Smt. Rajendra Kaur, 1989(3) Civil Court Cases 571. In that case a decree for restitution of conjugal rights was passed in favour of husband. Application for maintenance for wife was filed. The learned Single judge of Allahabad High Court was pleased to allow the revision petition. The learned Advocate for the petitioner argued that in this case also decree for restitution of conjugal rights in favour of the petitioner. However, the case being at interim stage, this point can be raised before the trial court. Therefore, it will be in the interest of the petitioner to raise these points before the trial Court. It will not be proper to consider all these aspects because the order challenged is an interlocutory order of the trial court and even no revision is maintainable. Again to repeat, all these aspects are to be considered by the trial court and the fact of decree of restitution of conjugal right has also to be considered by the trial court and I do not find it proper to interfere in the interim order passed by the trial court by this judgment in the revision petition.