RAM DITTA Vs. HARYANA STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This petition came up for motion hearing on January 20, 1986, when the Bench passed the following order :-

(2.) Shri O.P. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, started his arguments on the point on which the case was admitted to hearing by a larger Bench, but after arguing for some time, he very fairly conceded that he was unable to advance arguments in the case any further as the point on which the petition had been admitted to hearing by a Full Bench did not arise, nor did he wish to argue on that point.

(3.) In this situation, we do not express any opinion on the point specifically referred to in the admitting order as the learned counsel for the petitioner has conceded that he is unable to advance any arguments as no such point arises in this petition. Consequently, without going into the merits, we direct the office to post this petition for hearing before a learned single Judge for disposal on merits on the points that may arise for consideration. Order accordingly.