HARINDER SINGH Vs. CHARANJEET SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present application has been preferred under Sec. 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter 'Cr.P.C.') seeking grant of leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal dtd. 6/8/2021 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Fatehgarh Sahib, in a complaint case filed under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter 'NI Act').

(2.) The Hon'ble Supreme Court in M/s Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc., 2025(3) RCR (Criminal) 208, after considerable discussion and comparative interpretation of Ss. 372 and 378(4) of Cr.P.C., concluded that the victim has a right to file an appeal under Sec. 372 of Cr.P.C. before the Court of Sessions. Reliance in this regard can also be placed on Satish Kumar Versus Jugal Kishor in CRM-A-2700-MA-2018 decided on 2/7/2025. Further, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Vs. Raj Kumar Arora in 2025/NSC 498; 2025 SCC Online 819 has clarified that as a rule of thumb, judgments rendered shall be applicable retrospectively.

(3.) Therefore, in view of the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in Celestium Financial (supra), the present application seeking leave to appeal is remanded back to the learned Sessions Judge concerned with a direction to treat the same as filed under Sec. 372 of the Cr.P.C. and to dispose of by himself/herself or entrust it to appropriate Court for its disposal.