SONU KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus directing respondents No. 2 and 3 to get released the alleged detenue, as detailed in para No.5 of the petition.

(2.) There were proper arrangement of their stay and all facilities/amenities, as are required at brick kiln were duly extended to them. The brick kiln owner used to pay them admissible wages. The labourers/workers have further stated that , as their account have already been cleared by the properietor of brick kiln, therefore, as and when they want to leave the brick kiln, they are free to do so.

(3.) In view of the aforesaid reply, the petitioner was directed to remain present in Court on 11.01.2016, but he has not come forward and none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner on the last dates of hearing i.e. 11.01.2016 and 10.02.2016 and ultimately his non-bailable warrants were issued for today. Pursuant to the order dated 10.02.2016, the petitioner, namely, Sonu Kumar, is produced in Court today. He submitted an affidavit tendering his unqualified and unconditional apology for his mistake for filing the present petition.