RAM AVTAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Petitioner seeks benefit of regular bail pending trial in case FIR No.428 dated 18.11.2014 registered at Police Station Barwala, under Sections 107, 147, 148, 149, 186, 188, 120-B, 121, 121-A, 122, 123, 224, 225, 307, 332, 342, 353, 436 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25, 54, 59 of the Arms Act, Police Station Barwala, District Hisar, later altered by investigation as Sections 114, 147, 148, 149, 186, 188, 120-B, 121, 121A, 122, 123, 307, 332, 342, 353, 420, 435, 333, 326A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25, 27, 30 of the Arms Act, Sections 3/4/7 of Explosive Substance Act, Sections 3/4 PDPP Act and Sections 16, 18, 20, 22-C, 23 of the Unlawful Activity (Prevention) Act, 1967.

(2.) It may be briefly noticed that FIR in question came to be registered on the statement of Anil Kumar, Inspector. Allegations relate to an occurrence dated 18.11.2014. It was stated that for execution of the arrest warrants issued by this Court against Ram Pal, self-styled Guru, a police party was present at a distance of about 400 mtrs. from Sat Lok Ashram.

(3.) The present petitioner is stated to have been arrested on the spot on 18.11.2014. Prosecution version is that the petitioner is one of the main conspirators in the case and even a gun was recovered from the spot.