BHUPINDER SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Petitioner Bhupinder Singh alias Bhinda was convicted and sentenced by Learned Session Judge, Amritsar under Sections 302 and 449 IPC. He was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 5000/- in default thereof, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years under Section 302 IPC. He was also sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay fine of Rs.3000/-. In default thereof, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for one year under Section 449 IPC.

(2.) The Lower Court order as well as judgment of Division Bench of this Court is silent on this point that whether the sentence would run concurrently or consecutively. However, in view of Section 31 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in such cases the sentence will run consecutively i.e. one after the other.

(3.) The present petition has been filed by the petitioner stating that under Section 427 Cr.P.C. the sentences under Sections 302 and 449 should be directed to run concurrently. For this purpose, reliance has been placed upon the judgment passed in CRM-M- 18435-2015 by Coordinate Bench of this Court on 4.9.2015. The question will arise as to whether by way of separate petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the Court is competent to order that the sentences will run concurrently. Section 427 Cr.P.C provides as under :-