NAV PRAYAS Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner has challenged the fresh tender process undertaken by the respondents as well as a term of eligibility therein contending that the same is only to accommodate the private respondent No.4.

(2.) Respondent No.2 is a society for promotion of quality education for poor and meritorious students of Punjab. Respondent No.3 is the Deputy Commissioner, Bathinda, Punjab whereas respondent No.4 is 'Bagdanga Pachim Gheri Bishalakshmi Club', in whose favour the work order has been issued pursuant to the fresh tender process.

(3.) (A) On 08.12.2015, the official respondents invited tenders by a notice inviting tenders. Clause 'G' of the eligibility conditions read as under:-