SANDEEP @ MONU @ SONU Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties to this lis, all the above-captioned petitions, i.e. CRR-1795-2015 (Sandeep @ Monu @ Sonu Vs. State of Haryana) ; CRR-1946-2015 (Sakshi Vs. State of Haryana) and CRR-4501-2015 (Naresh Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and others) , are decided by the present common order, as all the three revision petitions have arisen out of the same impugned order.

(2.) Criminal Revision Nos.1795 and 1946 of 2015 have been filed by petitioners-accused Sandeep @ Monu @ Sonu and Sakshi, respectively, challenging the order framing charges against them for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 306, Penal Code. Criminal Revision No.4501 of 2015 has been filed by petitioner-informant-complainant Naresh Kumar challenging the same impugned order, dated 29.04.2015, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhiwani, whereby the charge for the offences punishable under Sections 66, 66-A and 67 of the Information and Technology Act, 2000 (for brevity, 'the I.T. Act'), were not framed for prosecution of petitioners-accused Sandeep @ Monu @ Sonu and Sakshi.

(3.) Mr.SanjayVashisth, and Mr.Sunil Sangwan, Advocates, representing petitioners-accused Sandeep @ Monu @ Sonu and Sakshi, respectively, submitted as under: