DR. RENU GUPTA Vs. STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner challenges the order dated 26.03.2014 (Annexure P-7) passed by respondent No.1-Commission, whereby the second appeal has been disposed of by coming to the conclusion that the permissible, available and existing information has been supplied to the appellant.

(2.) The petitioner sought information pertaining to the Advertisement No. 1/2012 published on 07.06.2012 for the post of PGT- HES-II (Group B Services), Category No.13 for the subject of Political Science, vide application dated 19.08.2013 (Annexure P-1). The SPIO of the Haryana School Teachers Selection Board supplied the information on 05.09.2013 (Annexure P-2) against the 9 categories for which information was sought. The petitioner not being satisfied prior to that had filed an appeal dated 04.09.2013 (Annexure P-3) before the First Appellate Authority. Thereafter, the respondent-Commission was approached. The information which is sought and what was supplied (Annexure P-5) read as under:-

(3.) Counsel for the petitioner candidly submits that he has no dispute regarding information sought at Sr. No. 1 and 6.