KAMLESH AND OTHERS Vs. VIJAY LAXMI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Cm No.18302-CII of 2016

(2.) It is the contention of learned counsel for the petitioners that the findings, as has been recorded by the Courts below, cannot sustain, especially in the light of the fact that the relationship of landlord and tenant is denied. He contends that apart from this, the finding that the petitioners are not residing in the demised premises, is also incorrect. Similar is the position with regard to the finding with regard to dilapidated condition of the demised premises. Assertion has also been made that the dismissal of the application for additional evidence as filed by the petitioners before the Appellate Authority also cannot sustain as it is only a judgment between the parties which has been rendered by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hisar, in Civil Appeal No.110 of 2008 preferred by the petitioner-Ram Singh against the respondents, where an injunction suit was filed against the respondents as also Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam, where the appeal was allowed and the suit as preferred by the petitioner was decreed. He, therefore, contends that the impugned orders passed by the Courts below cannot sustain and deserve to be set aside.

(3.) Notice of motion.