AMRESH UPADHYAY Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner has questioned the validity of order dated 11.03.2014 (Annexure P-4) and 23.04.2014 (Annexure P6) passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (for short 'Tribunal') in O.A. No.106/PB/2013 and R.A. No. 060/00056 of 2014.

(2.) The Railway Board vide memo dated 02.12.2010 issued to all the General Managers of Indian Railways including Production Units informed and explained regarding the engagement of Course Completed Act Apprentices as 'substitutes' in Group 'D' in Indian Railways which reads as follows:-

(3.) In view of the aforesaid communication the General Managers have been given powers in Administrative exigency to engage as "substitutes" in Group D Posts, those who have completed Course Completed Act Apprentices.