REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

RAVINDER KUMAR Appellant

V/S

State Of Haryana And Another Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

PRADYAT KUMAR BOSE V. THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF CALCUTTA HIGH COURT [REFERRED TO]
S.K. JAIN V. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
NAMIT SHARMA V. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
RETD. ARMED FORCED MEDICAL ASSOCIATION V. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
SHAMRAO V PARULEKAR STATE OF HYDERABAD VS. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE THANA BOMBAY:DISTRICT MAGISTRATE THANA BOMBAY [REFERRED TO]
KANAI LAL SUR VS. PARAMNIDHI SADHUKHAN [REFERRED TO]
CHINTAMAN RAO VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
BHUDAN SINGH VS. NABI BUX [REFERRED TO]
NASIRUDDIN RAMAI VS. STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL:STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
BALDEV RAJ GULIANI STATE OF HARYANA VS. PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT:BALDEV RAJ GULIANI [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. SANKALGHAND HIMATLAL SHETH [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. SANKALGHAND HIMATLAL SHETH [REFERRED TO]
HARGOVIND PANT VS. RAGHUKUL TILAK [REFERRED TO]
S SUNDARAM PILLAI KOUSALAYA DEVT MURUGESA MUDALIAR N S DHANALAKSHMI AMMAL THAHIRA BEEVI M BALAKRISHNAN K R KRISHNAN VS. V R PATTABIRAMAN:P LAKSHMINARAYANA CHARYA:SELVARAJ CHETTIAR:B S RAMACHARI:R A MUTHIAH NADAR:FATHIMA BAI:P BHANUMATT [REFERRED TO]
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT VS. DEEPAK MAHAJAN [REFERRED TO]
UTTAM DAS CHELA SUNDER DAS VS. SHIROMANI GURDWARA PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE AMRITSAR [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. U D DWIVEDI [REFERRED TO]
P V NARASIMHA RAO VS. STATE CBI SPE [REFERRED TO]
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH VS. P VENKU REDDY [REFERRED TO]
JUSTICE K P MOHAPATRA VS. RAM CHANDRA NAYAK [REFERRED TO]
SREENIVASAN VENUGOPALAN VS. JUSTICE M M PAREED PILLAY [REFERRED TO]
HAR GOVIND PANT VS. CHANCELLOR UNIVERSITY OF RAJASTHAN [REFERRED TO]
EMPEROR VS. BENOARI LAL SARMA [REFERRED TO]
S.KASIRAMALINGAM VS. CHIEF SECRETARY [REFERRED TO]
RAJESH AWASTHI VS. NAND LAL JAISWAL [REFERRED TO]
JUSTICE CHANDRASHEKARAIAH VS. JANEKERE C. KRISHNA [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. NAMIT SHARMA [REFERRED TO]
GURNEK SINGH BRAR VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
NUTAN THAKUR VS. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH VS. THE STATE OF BIHARAND ORS. [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Twin important questions of law, involved in the instant writ petition, that fall for consideration of this Court are:

(2.) Feeling aggrieved against the appointment of second respondent as Lokayukta for the State of Haryana, vide warrant of appointment dated 5.4.2016 (Annexure P-1), followed by notification dated 20.7.2016 (Annexure P-6), petitioner has approached this Court by way of present writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of Quo-Warranto. He also seeks a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the appointment of second respondent as Lokayukta for the State of Haryana.

(3.) Notice of motion was issued vide order dated 29.8.2016 and in compliance thereof, written statement was filed on behalf of State of Haryana-respondent No.1. Separate written statement was filed on behalf of second respondent.

Click here to view full judgment.

RAVINDER KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address