SUNIL Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This order shall dispose of the aforementioned two criminal revision petitions as the same have arisen from a common FIR No.53 dated 6.2.2012 under Sections 363 and 366-A read with Section 34 IPC registered at Police Station Meham, District Rohtak. Moreover, both the petitions have been filed against common judgment dated 1.9.2015 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Rohtak whereby appeals filed by the petitioners against enquiry dated 26.8.2014 and order of sentence dated 28.8.2014 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Rohtak (for short, the Board) was dismissed. Vide enquiry dated 26.8.2014, the Board held the petitioners guilty for the offence under Section 363 IPC and vide separate order on quantum of sentence dated 28.8.2014, the petitioners were sent to Special home for a period of one year, as both of them were juvenile at the time of commission of crime.

(2.) Learned counsel for the petitioners contend that so far as petitioner Devender alias Pillu is concerned, against the awarded sentence of one year, he is in actual custody for about 11 months and 26 days. Thus, he has virtually completed his sentence, whereas petitioner Sunil is in actual custody for about 7 months and 17 days.

(3.) Learned State counsel has filed custody certificate of petitioner Sunil in the Court, which is taken on record. Custody certificate of petitioner Devender alias Pillu is already on record.