DINESH CHANDER Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal was preferred by appellant Dinesh Chander, assailing the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 19.08.2003 recorded by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, in Session Case No.71 dated 19.12.2002 based on First Information Report No.199 dated 22.10.2002 registered at Police Station Division No.8, Ludhiana, by virtue of which he (appellant) was sentenced as under:- <FRM>JUDGEMENT_254_LAWS(P&H)8_2016.html</FRM>

(2.) The story of the prosecution was as under:- On 22.10.2002, Rajneesh Aneja son of Baldev Aneja, resident of 13-B Kitchlu Nagar, Ludhiana alongwith his mother Prem Lata, wife Suman Aneja and sister-in-law Sapna Aneja was present in his house when at about 11:45 a.m., a clean shaven person entered his house and on pistol point directed the ladies in the house to go in one room. He asked them to take of all their ornaments, failing which they shall be shot dead. Rajneesh Aneja tried to apprehend the robber, who with an intention to kill him, fired a shot but that hit the wall. Suman Aneja also tried to catch the robber who gave a bite on her finger of right hand and injured the same. Their shouts attracted the neighbours. Rajneesh Aneja snatched the pistol from the hand of the assailant and as the people gathered, he was apprehended. On query, the robber (appellant) disclosed his name as Dinesh Chander son of Dulare Lal, resident of Akaipur, District Farukhabad (U.P.) at present resident of 'Pandit Da Makann' near Big Gate, Sahnewal. On receipt of information, the police reached the spot and arrested the appellant. On personal search of the appellant, three live cartridges of .32 bore were recovered from his right pocket. On unloading the pistol, an empty cartridge was also recovered. The pistol, the empty and the three live cartridges were taken into possession by the police. Statement Ex.PA of Rajneesh Aneja was recorded by Sub Inspector Devinder Kumar and based on the same the First Information Report Ex.PA/2 was registered at Police Station Division No.8, Ludhiana. On completion of investigation and other formalities, the appellant was challaned and sent to the Court for trial.

(3.) The appellant was charge-sheeted and subjected to face trial for commission of offence punishable under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, "I.P.C.") and Section 25 of the Arms Act.