PUNJAB STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD Vs. TOOR RICE MILLS, BHAWANIGARH, DISTRICT SANGRUR AND ANOTHER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The appellant-PUNSUP is aggrieved of the order dated 14.5.2008, whereby the objections filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short "1996 Act") for setting-aside the award dated 23.1.2004, have been accepted.

(2.) Mr.Rakesh Gupta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant-PUNSUP has raised the following submissions:-

(3.) There is no mention of the name of the partner nor his personal address. Even otherwise, in case the award was to be executed, in the absence of such address, the same could not be executed. The Objecting Court also found that the claim of the PUNSUP was falling with the excepted clause and, therefore, accepted the objections. In the end, the learned counsel prays for dismissal of the appeal. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and appraised the paper book.