GURBACHAN KAUR Vs. PARAMJIT SINGH AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Cm-1778-C-2012 IN RSA-627-2012 For the reasons stated in the application which is duly supported by an affidavit, the delay of 210 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned.

(2.) Main CASES

(3.) Mr. Vikas Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant(s)-defendant(s) in both the appeals submits that the appellant(s)- defendant(s) in the written statement categorically denied the execution of the agreement to sell and stated that it was a loan transaction of Rs. 50,000/-, which had been repaid, but the blank stamp papers have been used for agreement to sell. The agreement to sell was dated 08.10.2001 and the alleged target date was 08.10.2002. The respondent No.1-plaintiff is stated to have paid earnest money of Rs. 2,32,000/- against the total sale consideration of Rs. 3,60,000/-, whereas in the second suit, against the total sale consideration of Rs. 1,42,500/-, a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- had been paid as earnest money and the extended target date was 20.04.2002.