RAN SINGH Vs. KASAM DEEN AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The defendant is the revision petitioner before this Court aggrieved against the order of injunction issued in favour of the respondent-plaintiffs. The contention was that he had already obtained a relief of injunction on the basis of the proposal of lease in the year 2004 and kabaliatnama directed to be executed. The plaintiffs were also parties in that suit when injunction had been granted recognising the defendant in suit and the petitioner herein as the party in possession.

(2.) The plaintiffs had filed the suit contending that the suit properties are notified waqf and was being used as a graveyard. The change in character of property shall not be permitted. The Court observed that the injunction obtained by the defendant-petitioner herein had been the subject of appeal but it would not be taken as final. The Court, therefore, proceeded to grant relief of injunction in favour of the plaintiffs that the property cannot be leased since it was a graveyard.

(3.) The petitioner argued that khasra girdawaries have entered agricultural operation having been carried at the waqf property and, therefore, the relief of injunction sought by the plaintiffs must have been declined and the defendant cannot be in any way prevented from enjoying the property lawfully granted in lease. It will be too wide a proposition to state that the property which was notified as waqf, being a graveyard, cannot be leased at all. There have been untilised and unused graveyards in the States of Punjab, Haryana and Himachal Pradesh on account of large transmigration of people to Pakistan and there has been leases in respect of such property. The legislature has recognised this situation when it brought an amendment to Act of 2013 w.e.f. 20.9.2013. Sec. 51 of the Wakf Act, 1995 has been amended by the Amendment Act 27 of 2013 incorporating the substitution of clause (1) with a proviso Sec. 51 reads thus:-